problem 2
Separating Oblivious and Adaptive Models of Variable Selection
Chen, Ziyun, Li, Jerry, Tian, Kevin, Zhu, Yusong
Sparse recovery is among the most well-studied problems in learning theory and high-dimensional statistics. In this work, we investigate the statistical and computational landscapes of sparse recovery with $\ell_\infty$ error guarantees. This variant of the problem is motivated by \emph{variable selection} tasks, where the goal is to estimate the support of a $k$-sparse signal in $\mathbb{R}^d$. Our main contribution is a provable separation between the \emph{oblivious} (``for each'') and \emph{adaptive} (``for all'') models of $\ell_\infty$ sparse recovery. We show that under an oblivious model, the optimal $\ell_\infty$ error is attainable in near-linear time with $\approx k\log d$ samples, whereas in an adaptive model, $\gtrsim k^2$ samples are necessary for any algorithm to achieve this bound. This establishes a surprising contrast with the standard $\ell_2$ setting, where $\approx k \log d$ samples suffice even for adaptive sparse recovery. We conclude with a preliminary examination of a \emph{partially-adaptive} model, where we show nontrivial variable selection guarantees are possible with $\approx k\log d$ measurements.
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Piedmont > Turin Province > Turin (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Afghanistan > Parwan Province > Charikar (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Greater London > London (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Bavaria > Upper Bavaria > Munich (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Government (0.70)
- Information Technology (0.48)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.05)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > Connecticut (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States (0.05)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.05)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- (5 more...)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Mercer County > Princeton (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States > New York > Kings County > New York City (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia (0.04)
- (7 more...)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- North America > United States > Wisconsin (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (0.96)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning > Gradient Descent (0.40)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning > Dimensionality Reduction (0.40)
- North America > United States > California > Yolo County > Davis (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Mountain View (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia (0.04)
- Europe > Spain > Catalonia > Barcelona Province > Barcelona (0.04)
- Education > Educational Setting > Online (1.00)
- Education > Educational Technology > Educational Software > Computer Based Training (0.34)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Performance Analysis > Accuracy (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (0.93)